It’s not the opinion but who says it. First, conventional geriatric, Jurassic, ossified and fossilized news media better realize that there’s a news explosion. And if you want to stick to the Cronkite model and that Berlin Wall of news versus commentary approach, you’re toast. Besides it’s not that commentary is verboten in news, it’s what and which commentary. To wit, if a reporter opines that a shooting was the result of yet another failure in gun laws or mindlessly trumpets bogus war data as the New York Times did anent Iraq, no sweat, no problem. It’s farcical to think that either a rhyme or reason exists to explain these rules.